Each Thursday, we will feature the trailers for all the new movies opening in our neck of the woods (i.e. the Seattle area). Blockbusters, Indies, or something in between, preparation for your weekend moviegoing is all in one place.
“ALICE IN WONDERLAND” (Family/Fantasy Adventure – Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway)
“BROOKLYN’S FINEST” (Action/Crime – Richard Gere, Ethan Hawke, Don Cheadle, Wesley Snipes)
Starring: Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover, Matt Lucas, Leo Bill, Stephen Fry, Michael Sheen, Alan Rickman, Timothy Spall, Frances de la Tour, Imelda Staunton, Christopher Lee.
___________________________
Director: Tim Burton
Rating: PG
Running Time: 108 Mins.
Release Date: March 5, 2010
DVD Release Date: TBD
Box Office: $TBD
___________________________
Roth Films, The Zanuck Company, Team Todd, Tim Burton Productions and Walt Disney Pictures.
Written By: Linda Woolverton, adapted from the books of Lewis Carroll.
“You still think this is all a dream?” – The Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp)
When the announcement came that Tim Burton would be filming a remake of “Alice In Wonderland”, lots of expectations came with that news. Although Burton’s distinctive style and approach has not always resulted with success, his bold and daring vision in telling a story would seem to lend itself perfectly to one of the more confounding entries in children’s literature; Lewis Carroll’s beloved “Alice” series.
As word and a pesky version of the script leaked, it was revealed that Burton was approaching his “Alice” as a hybrid remake/sequel to the original story…and in 3-D no less (!). Naturally, people’s interests piqued. Seeing the final result, Burton and his cast go for broke in rebooting “Alice” for a new generation and as is probably to be expected, they succeed more than they fail.
Following the death of her father and now 19, unable and unwilling to fit in with Victorian society, Alice (Mia Wasikowska) discovers that she is on the verge of an arranged engagement she is defiantly set against. In her desperation to avoid marrying the insufferable Hamish (Leo Bill), Alice notices a white rabbit in a waistcoat carrying an oversized pocket watch running in and around the periphery of her engagement party. Familiar to her, she follows the white rabbit into a maze and ultimately tumbles into the seemingly never-ending rabbit hole, finally landing in the middle of Underland, referred to by its residents as “Wonderland”. A crazed and staggered group of characters remember Alice’s previous visit and are stunned by her return, although Alice struggles to remember ever being there before.
In stark opposition to Alice is the Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter). The ruler of Underland, she is the mother of two precocious twin boys, Tweedledee and Tweedledum (Matt Lucas), and despises the animal inhabitants of Underland, as well as her younger sister, the White Queen (Anne Hathaway). The Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) is Alice’s close friend and a kindred spirit for Alice in Underland. Slightly manic in personality and jarring to look at with reddish/orange hair and gigantic emerald green eyes, Depp is yet again able to put believability into the most eccentric of characters. Alice and the Mad Hatter resonate nicely here with the Mad Hatter’s uneasiness in Underland a direct correlation to the discomfort Alice experiences in her Victorian life. Depp and Wasikowska, when allowed to, share some great moments together on screen.
The absurd appearance of the Red Queen, her head at least three times larger than her dwarf-like body, is impressively played by Burton’s partner, Helena Bonham Carter. Watching the Red Queen, you feel as if time moves differently for her than with other people. She talks fast, thinks fast, and as much as she thinks she has control over those in Underland, she really lacks any control over anything once Alice arrives. As the Red Queen’s power and influence risks being eradicated, she begins to shout the classic line, “Off With Their Heads…” with the frequency of a skipping record; each utterance more desperate and comical than the one before it. Again, Tim Burton has laid out a fantastical and magical landscape to tell his story, and his three leads zealously take charge of the film.
With Tim Burton’s films, I come to the same criticism time and time again. In my mind, Burton has achieved perfection once (“Ed Wood”), arguably twice (“Edward Scissorhands” and/or perhaps, “Nightmare Before Christmas”). Without question he remains an exciting and important filmmaker, standing amongst the best of his peers in having the innate ability to see stories in stunning and original ways.
Yet specifically, there is always a point in a Burton film (above names excluded) where I tend to drift out and disengage. With “Alice In Wonderland”, this occurs rather frequently in the film’s second half and no more egregiously than in the film’s final action sequence – an epic battle between the Red Queen’s army and those loyal to the White Queen. Tim Burton has never really shown the ability to succeed at tackling the big action sequence (“Planet of the Apes” come to mind?) and the final battle is a long, turgid mess. Even the appearance of the rather frightening Jabberwock monster tends to add only the wrong kind of chaos to the battle scene and fails in delivering the suspense Burton is clearly angling for.
Far from Burton’s best work, “Alice In Wonderland” is a fascinating watch, but not nearly as good of a movie, per se. Let me be clear – there’s a lot to like on the surface. Burton, always a strong director for the female character, builds the entire film around relative newcomer, Mia Wasikowska (Amelia, Defiance). Although the marketing might focus its sights elsewhere, Wasikowska is in virtually every scene and more than holds her own with all the shenanigans running amok around her. If the film is well received, this could be a breakout performance for the Australian actress.
Burton keeps things moving at a brisk pace for much of the film, and his vision of what lies at the bottom of the iconic rabbit hole is rather remarkable. You get vintage Burton moments, themes, and presentation – stabs of color snuggle in next to drab and dark set pieces. Outlandish characters steal your eye and to his credit, TIm Burton’s movies have that carnival/funhouse feel to them. Visually, the film’s presentation is so engaging that I fell into the trappings of “seeing” the movie and not actually “watching” it.
Save a badly conceived third act, “Alice In Wonderland” is, in totality, fine entertainment. Like much of Burton’s work, the film is too dark and scary for the littlest of kids. Older kids, if inclined, should have a big Cheshire cat style grin from ear-to-ear as they take in the inventiveness and marvel at the subtle and effective 3-D on display. Just watch it, don’t think too much about it, and you shall return from the trip down the rabbit hole largely unscathed.
Should I See It?
YES
If you are a Tim Burton fan, you’ve already made plans to watch it and/or are heading back to see this again.
Three strong performances by Alice, The Mad Hatter, and the Red Queen really are better than expected. Johnny Depp is eccentric but exhibits a realness at times with his character and his work with Mia Wasikowska stands out at times. Everyone looks as if they had a ball working on the film.
Visually arresting at times, “Alice In Wonderland”, with its fantastic and subtle 3-D presentation, is really worth seeing on the big screen.
NO
Despite the positives, the film cannot sustain itself through much of a third act battle sequence that, regardless of whether it exists in the source material or not, nearly changes the tone of the film to such a degree that you forget the good.
The Jabberwock dragon/beast hybrid is jarringly intense in action and presentation and if family members are at all sensitive to something like this, be warned.
To some lovers of the two books providing the source material for Burton, the liberties taken will not be accepted all that well I imagine.
Some will shrug thinking they have seen the dark and sublime Tim Burton movie one too many times.
With the Oscars under 5 days away, have I got a challenge for you…If you live in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Toronto, or Washington, D.C. – 10 Best Picture nominees, one theater, 24-hours. You think I’m kidding? (Scroll to the bottom of the page…): AMPAS
Robert Pattinson talks about “Breaking Dawn”, his new film, “Remember Me”, and a role that could have launched him big time before “Twilight”: HitFix
Neil Patrick Harris sees one rumor laid to rest and one rumor confirmed: Yahoo!
James Cameron stirs up the controversy stew with his next potential project – (and its not the film he wants to make in 4-D): Yahoo!
On the heels of its producers campaigning for Best Picture scandal, more bad press for that-little-that-just-might, “The Hurt Locker”. Lawsuits are imminent and Kris Tapley at In Contention takes a deeper look at the merits…or lack thereof: In Contention
Seems the clock is ticking faster and faster on Blockbuster: Variety
Always a fun glance, the latest ratings from the MPAA on future film releases: Box Office Mojo
“Shutter Island” makes it 2 weekends in a row at #1, while “Cop Out” and “Crazies” open well and should each turn a good profit: Box Office Mojo
Captain Kirk, Jake Sully, Deadpool, Bradley Cooper, Jake Gyllenhaal and more “men” added to the Oscar presenters list: HitFix
And even more big names…The five actors and actresses speaking to the acting nominees format will return, slightly revamped, will feature friends of the nominees, as opposed to former Oscar winners. One of the presenters…Oprah!: HitFix
Speaking of Oprah, unable to eat or drink any longer, Roger Ebert speaks for the first time in 4 years. Just incredible…: Oprah
If you happened to hear about “The Hurt Locker” producer who sent out the E-mail encouraging Academy voters to not vote for the “$500M” movie and vote for theirs…well, he can catch up with family this Sunday: Hollywood News
You really don’t want to upset the King of the World now do you? Sorry Sacha Baron Cohen, you sit at home on Sunday also…: Vulture
We’re back with our daily news link feature – Now actually daily:
The Academy Awards are this Sunday and the list of presenters is growing seemingly by the hour: We are tracking the confirmed names here.
The incredible Roger Ebert makes his return to TV on “Oprah” tomorrow, unveiling his new ‘voice’. If you don’t know Roger Ebert’s incredible story, check this out: Esquire
Helena Bonham Carter talks transitioning from British costume dramas to playing ridiculously over-the-top characters, like The Red Queen in the forthcoming “Alice In Wonderland”: Yahoo!
With “Wall Street 2″ coming soon, Michael Douglas opens up about his life, his marriage, and the troubles facing his son, Cameron: Vanity Fair
Starring: Bruce Willis, Tracy Morgan, Guillermo Diaz, Kevin Pollak, Adam Brody, Seann William Scott, Michelle Trachtenberg, Jason Lee, Rashida Jones, Susie Essman, Fred Armisen, Ana de la Reguera.
___________________________
Director: Kevin Smith
Rating: R
Running Time: 110 Mins.
Release Date: February 26, 2010
DVD Release Date: TBD
Box Office: $TBD
___________________________
Marc Platt Productions and Warner Bros. Pictures.
Written By: Robb Cullen & Mark Cullen
“Let’s go be great…” – Paul Hodges (Tracy Morgan)
Prior to the beginning of screening “Cop Out”, Warner Bros. unveiled “exclusive” trailers for two of their priority projects for the Spring movie season; namely, “Clash Of The Titans” and the relaunch of the “A Nightmare On Elm Street” franchise. Now, I mention this not to boast about seeing new trailers; rather, as “Cop Out”’s final credits scrolled on screen and the film was finally over, it seemed, oh I dunno, fitting let’s say that everything Warner Bros. gave me for entertainment were things which had been done before. Whether “Clash” and/or “Nightmare” improve or enhance the original is a trivial thought after sitting through “Cop Out”, a weary and overlong mismatched cop film we have all seen too many times through the years.
For his first film as a director without also writing the screenplay, Kevin Smith is an odd choice for this project. The strengths of a Kevin Smith project – quick-paced, witty, smart dialogue, engaging and identifiable characters, are all non-existent here. Other than a handful of amusing moments, “Cop Out” is rather stale, flat, and uninspired filmmaking.
Initially, the problems begin with the chemistry between Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan. Willis and Morgan certainly like one another and are having fun with Smith allowing them to improv back and forth on screen, but you never once believe in the slightest way possible that Willis and Morgan have been partnered together as NYPD for 9 years. Their pairing feels slapped together in a boardroom with Willis looking to reinvent himself and return to box office relevancy and Morgan looking to capitalize on his goodwill from his hilarious work on TV’s “30 Rock”. A bit disingenuous if you ask me.
The premise is unoriginal and the plot hinges on the absurd. Willis and Morgan have been suspended following an informant’s murder during a sting operation and Willis is hoping to use his next month’s pay to fund his daughter’s upcoming wedding. Suspended without pay for 30 days (don’t ask how much Willis’ character earns per month, because it apparently doesn’t matter), Willis decides to sell his most prized possession, a rare 1952 baseball card which recently fetched $83,000 on the trading market. Unfortunately, the trading card shop gets robbed and the baseball card leaves with the robbers. As Willis and Morgan try to find the baseball card, they continue to run into connections with the drug trafficking case which resulted in their suspension. Naturally, the drug lord is a sports memorabilia fanatic(!) and may have the card in his possession. Striking a deal with Willis and Morgan, a stolen vehicle needs to be found and the card will be returned. Or not. So, Smith and the Cullen Brothers (Ed. Note: I said Cullen, not Coen) give us mindless shootouts, relentless stereotypes of Mexican drug culture, action sequences that have no pulse or intensity, and the hot hostage that fits absolutely nowhere in the scope of the film.
“Cop Out” is, in the right mindset, a rather spectacular failure across the board. However, what redeems it as a passable watch are the existence of a handful of amusing moments, which are all prompted by improvisation and actors trying to one up each other. Seann William Scott (Stifler from the “American Pie” films) steals the film in his few short scenes as a Parkour-addicted robber who ranks easily as one of the most antagonistic backseat passengers in any of these mismatched action/comedy cop films. If you are reminded of Joe Pesci in “Lethal Weapon 3″ (and 4), I suppose I can begrudge you that Scott is in the Pesci spot here. However, he is simply too funny to dismiss and his interplay with Tracy Morgan is quite hilarious. Willis and Morgan connect on a couple of zingers and Morgan is really working hard to deliver here. Yet, perhaps victimized by Kevin Smith not writing the script, Smith’s directing of Morgan seems lost and unrefined. Reigning him in would better serve the movie.
Then again, “Cop Out” is so tired and overwrought that the bad suffocates the good. We have the “Beverly Hills Cop”-style score by actual “Beverly Hills Cop” composer Harold Faltermeyer. Smith spikes in rap music from the late 80’s and early 90’s for what reason, I could never determine, except perhaps as a favor to the songwriters. That “Cop Out” is set in present day makes the music selections completely confounding. The action sequences play out with no drama. Shootouts occur simply because Morgan and Willis have to burn through some bullets. Jason Lee and Michelle Trachtenburg drop in for a moment’s notice and other than one great verbal beatdown by Lee to Willis, both are forgotten the moment they depart from the film.
Overall, “Cop Out” is a pretty major misfire; one that undoubtedly looked good on paper (or in that Warner Bros. boardroom), but never figures out if it’s a comedy, an action movie, or a hybrid of the two. While not as horrendous as whatever that Chris Rock/Anthony Hopkins film was a few years back, this is nowhere near a “Lethal Weapon” or even a “Rush Hour 2″.
In fact with “Cop Out” following those “Clash Of The Titans” and “Nightmare On Elm Street” trailers, we have a film that more than lives up to its title and serves as further proof that perhaps they really have run out of original ideas in Hollywood. Wonder if they’ve green-lighted a sequel yet?
Should I See It?
YES
Those in attendance did seem to laugh out loud fairly often, so perhaps the improvisation and oneupsmanship will appeal to fans of Kevin Smith.
Seann William Scott steals the movie right out from underneath Willis and Morgan. His 3 or 4 scenes make the film rather entertaining when he’s on screen.
People do apparently still love the police officer buddy picture, since they continue to be made. Fans of the genre will most likely have little to complain about here I suppose.
NO
Long stretches of time go by where the film just doesn’t do much of anything. Jokes bomb, action sequences are rather tepid, and the whole thing is really rather boring.
Not only do we have another mismatched cops action film, but we also have the return of the stereotypical 1980’s mexican drug cartel as well. Lazy and borderline offensive.
Bless his heart, but I will never for a moment believe that Tracy Morgan is a well-respected 9-year veteran of the NYPD who can brandish a weapon and have marksman-like shooting abilities.
Each Thursday, we will feature the trailers for all the new movies opening in our neck of the woods (i.e. the Seattle area). Blockbusters, Indies, or something in between, preparation for your weekend moviegoing is all in one place.
“COP OUT” (Action/Comedy – Bruce Willis, Tracy Morgan)
“THE CRAZIES” (Horror – Timothy Olyphant, Radha Mitchell, Danielle Panabaker)
“THE GHOST WRITER” (Suspense/Thriller – Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan, Kim Cattrall)
Starring: Gabourey Sidibe, Mo’Nique, Paula Patton, Mariah Carey, Sherri Shepherd, Lenny Kravitz, Stephanie Andujar, Chyna Layne.
___________________________
Director: Lee Daniels
Rating: R
Running Time: 110 Mins.
Release Date: November 6, 2009
DVD Release Date: March 9, 2010
Box Office: $46,819,335
___________________________
Smokewood Entertainment Group, Lee Daniels Entertainment and Lionsgate.
Written By: Geoffrey Fletcher, based on the novel by Sapphire
“My name is Clareece ‘Precious’ Jones. I wish I had a light-skinned boyfriend with real nice hair. And I want to be on the cover of a magazine. But first, I wanna be in one of those BET videos.” – Precious (Gabourey Sidibe)
Passing by a stranger on the street, we all make assumptions. We may not outwardly admit to it, but assumptions are a part of human nature. Those assumptions and the prejudices that can prove as a breeding ground for those assumptions are confronted head on in Lee Daniels’ powerful and uncompromising, “Precious: Based On The Novel ‘Push’ By Sapphire.”
For example, take this film’s lead character, Clareece ‘Precious’ Jones. To look at her is to be dared to judge her. She is tall, obese, African-American, her clothes don’t exactly fit and she seldom talks and keeps to herself. As a schoolmate of Precious, you would see that as a fellow middle school student, she is much older than you (16) and takes special classes because she lacks the ability to read or write. You might also be aware that she has a Down Syndrome child and lives on the dangerous side of Harlem. Perhaps, you have seen classmates yell derogatory names at her, tease her repeatedly and even be physically violent against her.
Have an image and some preconceived notions in mind? Director Lee Daniels, his screenwriter Geoffrey Fletcher, and the source material’s author, Sapphire, know that you do. And they have no fear in confronting them head on in an uncomfortable, but necessary manner.
At the heart of “Precious” the movie is that Precious, the girl, has not given up on her life. This is not an inner city child addicted to drugs, selling drugs, or looking for an easy way out. Yes she idolizes BET videos and, in voice-over, unabashedly shares her desires of becoming a part of the stereotypical images common to African-American pop culture. But, who amongst us doesn’t seek escape from the difficulties in life from time to time? And while we soon learn that Precious’ difficulties are extreme in nature and unbelievably devastating to observe, she gets up every morning and sets out to make each day a little better than the one before yet.
There are constant roadblocks in her way. Pregnant for the second time with another child conceived by her rapist father, Precious is being expelled from her middle school. As a saving grace, she is enrolled in the Each One/Teach One alternative school program and placed with teacher and counselor, Ms. Rain (Paula Patton). Defiant in opposition to this idea is Precious’ mother, Mary, brought to life in a jaw-dropping, frightening performance by comedienne and talk show host, Mo’Nique. In fact, Mary is opposed to any idea that does not involve Precious cooking, cleaning, and taking care of Mary in all capacities of life. Abusive verbally and physically, Mary’s one piece of motherly advice is to forget about school and simply to “go and get that welfare”. Precious strikes up a connection with her welfare counselor, Ms. Weiss (Mariah Carey). Suddenly, Precious has two small building blocks in her life – school and a counselor; avenues which may lead her out of the deplorable conditions she battles behind closed doors.
It is a rather obvious statement to make, but to bring a film like this to the screen is an absolute risk. The novelist of “Push”, Sapphire, has stated that her book may have brought many directors and producers to the table, but that she and others dismissed attempts to bring the story to life on the big screen. Sometimes fresh eyes and a fresh take on things can work wonders, and Lee Daniels’ vision and approach to telling this story is remarkable.
One moment we are envisioning the dreams Precious has in being a celebrity, with a light-skinned boyfriend, and the envy of everyone around her. Then, just as quickly, we stare at a pot of boiling pigs feet, zone in on the constant loop of game shows on the family television, or cringe at the horrors Precious encounters within the walls of her apartment. Bold and yet never exploitative, Daniels’ tells Precious’ story in direct correlation to how Precious, the person, would want her story told. Jumping in and out of reality, staring at things that to an outsider might seem rather inconsequential, and facing down pain and opportunity with an equal eye, “Precious…” is fearless.
Newcomer Gabourey Sidibe gives a haunting and memorable performance in the lead role, and along with Mo’Nique’s incredible work, Mariah Carey wipes away the “Glitter” of past performances with a sincere and moving portrayal as Precious’ welfare counselor. Paula Patton is effective as the teacher who takes Precious to new academic heights, while providing a direct example to Precious that you cannot judge a book by its cover. That message, albeit one that may scream of cliche and appear as rather simplistic, gets reiterated time and time again; perhaps no more definitively than in a stunning and shocking final scene as Mary Jones attempts to rationalize the decisions and parenting choices she has made in raising her only child.
Fearless in tone and uncompromising in its final form, Lee Daniels’ “Precious: Based On The Novel ‘Push’ By Sapphire” is an earnest essay on the power inherent in people to overcome adversity and find a life worth living – no matter the circumstances.
“Precious: Based On The Novel ‘Push’ By Sapphire” received the following Academy Award nominations for 2009:
Best Picture
Best Directing (Lee Daniels)
Best Actress (Gabourey Sidibe)
Best Supporting Actress (Mo’Nique)
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Film Editing
Should I See It?
YES
Raw, unpolished, but as honest as anything you will see, “Precious” is a film which has that feel of something that should be seen by as many people as possible.
There are difficult and unnerving moments which cannot be ignored, but the film carries a message of hope and possibility that is unshakable.
The acting on display is pitch perfect and real. Sidibe, Mo’Nique, Carey, and Patton all deliver moving and powerful work.
NO
The abusive relationship between Precious and her parents is unflinching and may prove to be too much for some viewers.
The artistic, independent flourishes that Daniels indulges in may prove to be too distracting and take some viewers out of the story.
It has been alleged that the film is simply a manipulative propaganda piece about the disadvantaged in America. I completely disagree, but acknowledge the sentiment might exist with some viewers.
Each Thursday, we will feature the trailers for all the new movies opening in our neck of the woods (i.e. the Seattle area). Blockbusters, Indies, or something in between, preparation for your weekend moviegoing is all in one place.
“SHUTTER ISLAND“ (Mystery, Suspense/Thriller – Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley)
“THE 2010 OSCAR NOMINATED SHORT FILMS” (Animated and Dramatic Short Films)
In the Seattle area, the Oscar nominated Short Films are playing one weekend only at the Varsity Theater
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Max Von Sydow, Michelle Williams, Emily Mortimer, Patricia Clarkson, Jackie Earle Haley, Ted Levine, John Carroll Lynch, Elias Koteas.
___________________________
Director: Martin Scorsese
Rating: R
Running Time: 138 Mins.
Release Date: February 26, 2010
DVD Release Date: TBD
Box Office: $41,062,440
___________________________
Phoenix Pictures, Sikelia Productions, Appian Way and Paramount Pictures.
Written By: Laeta Kalogridis, adapted from the novel by Dennis Lehane
“I’m-a blow the lid off this place…” – Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio)
Thick fog. Ominous foreboding music. A title card tells us it’s Boston 1954. Slowly emerging through the fog comes a ferry plodding its way to a remote island. On board, two federal marshals, Edward “Teddy” Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio), himself a former WWII vet, and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo). Their task – find a missing murderess being held at the Shutter Island Correctional Facility.
From the opening moments of Martin Scorsese’s “Shutter Island”, the 4th collaboration between Scorsese and DiCaprio, we are tossed into a throwback to the classic film noir genre of the 1940’s and 1950’s where nothing is as it initially appears and the characters may not be completely forthright with their intentions. Scorsese, a well-renowned film historian and preservationist, knows this genre perhaps as well as anyone and nails the atmosphere and mood superbly from the opening moments.
Shutter Island is a dark and dreary looking place; a landmass which seems to have emerged in the middle of nowhere. The island is awash in a heavy gray hue and even the surrounding woods and plantlife seem stripped of any real color. With a loud two-chord “duh duh” music cue setting the stage, Scorsese and his team make Shutter Island no place you would ever care to visit. And soon, you learn why…
Home to three wards of patients, identified as the most dangerous of the mentally ill, Daniels and Aule are called to the island to investigate the disappearance of Rachel Solando, a patient committed at the facility after drowning her three young children. Most puzzling in her disappearance is that she has seemingly disappeared without a trace, apparently escaping from a locked cell and a small, metal-barred window. The lead psychiatrist, Dr. Cawley (Ben Kingsley), is agreeable in assisting the investigators, but raises issue when he feels his patients’ most private information will be compromised. Kingsley plays Cawley expertly here and his battle of wills with DiCaprio makes for riveting theater.
During the investigation’s beginnings, it soon becomes apparent that all is not right with Teddy Daniels. Suffering from migraine headaches and graphic and unsettling WWII flashbacks, he is prone to nightmarish dreams and debilitating hallucinatory episodes which render his investigation, shall we say, ineffective. Rapidly, Daniels’ headaches, confusion between what’s real and not real, and his inability to gain any traction on the case begin to work against him. When Solando appears back in her cell early one morning unharmed and as if she never left, things unravel completely for Daniels. In a meeting with his partner, Daniels reveals ulterior motives as to his involvement in the case, leading Aule to realize that the marshals may be in way over their heads.
With “Shutter Island”, it’s hard not to envision Scorsese sitting right off screen with eyes wide open, beaming, carrying a smile from ear to ear. Even during the film’s quietest and darkest of visual moments, “Shutter Island” is engaging and at times captivating. We embark down long corridors and intimidating hallways, are stuck on the island during a massive hurricane and then realize its visitors cannot leave on their own accord, as ferry service to and from Shutter Island must be approved beforehand by a meeting of the Board of Directors. Scorsese has you in the palm of his hand for the first 90 minutes or so, until cracks in the narrative emerge and rather surprisingly, the film’s effectiveness wains rather quickly.
“Shutter Island” the book and “Shutter Island” the film build to and depend wholeheartedly on a major plot twist; one I was able to decipher very early on. In looking again at the trailer and researching the marketing materials, I would argue the studio may have already given it away. I’ll leave that for you to decide.
In a post-”Sixth Sense” world, film twists are more frequent and less effective than in the past. A decade removed from M. Night Shyamalan’s groundbreaking suspense film, the narrative twist has almost become its own cliche, and unfortunately, nothing the twist generates in “Shutter Island” packs much of a punch. Sure, there are some specifics which you may not pick up on and to Scorsese’s credit, he could not have known that Paramount Pictures would risk giving so much away. Most unfortunate for Scorsese and the viewer is that the power and effectiveness the final scenes reach for, scenes designed to make your jaw fall open and question everything you’ve seen prior, are all hinged on something so obvious.
Whether you enjoy the film or not will be predicated on your reaction to what “Shutter Island” has for you behind its proverbial Door #1. Scorsese does not shy away from confronting the most disturbing moments head on, especially with DiCaprio’s horrifying nightmares and the film’s unsettling child drowning subplot.
Starting strong and sliding you to the edge of your seat from the get-go, “Shutter Island” had enough of a foundation built for me that I could withstand the disappointing finale. Coupled with Scorsese’s deft hand and exuberant directing, as well as strong and memorable performances from DiCaprio and Kingsley, “Shutter Island” is hard not to appreciate. Liking it or even loving it rests on one distinctive moment and how strong your foundation will be in accepting it.
Should I See It?
YES
DiCaprio and Scorsese. Scorsese and DiCaprio. Together again. Their comfort level with one another only reaps great rewards and both are at the top of their game here.
If you like creepy and intense, much of “Shutter Island” should satiate your interests. There are jarring moments of hard imagery and unsettling visuals which add to the overwhelming sense of desperation.
Aesthetically, the film is masterfully executed. Scorsese’s films are consistently amongst the best when it comes to editing, cinematography, and production design.
NO
The plot deals with investigating a mother who is imprisoned for drowning her three young children. The film does not shy away from detailing this element of the story and the visuals could serve as difficult to watch.
For some viewers, the complex narrative may not be all that interesting, especially if you groan at the twist.
For certain moviegoers, Martin Scorsese films are similar to the vegetable your parents made you eat at dinner every night. Even with all the style and presentation, this could still be that vegetable for anti-Scorsese fans.
Your Thoughts…