|
Rating:    
Starring: Emily Browning, Abbie Cornish, Jena Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, Carla Gugino, Oscar Isaac, Jon Hamm, Scott Glenn, Gerard Plunkett, Malcolm Scott, Alan C. Peterson.
___________________________
Director: Zack Snyder
Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 109 Mins.
Release Date: March 25, 2011
Home Video Release Date: June 28, 2011
Box Office: $36.4 Million
___________________________
Cruel & Unusual Films, Legendary Pictures, Lennox House Films, and Warner Bros. Pictures.
Written by: Zack Snyder and Steve Shibuya, story by Zack Snyder.
|
| “What you are imagining right now…you control this world.”- Madame Gorski (Carla Gugino).
Zack Snyder has described “Sucker Punch” as “‘Alice In Wonderland’ meets machine guns.” The film’s tag line says “You Will Be Unprepared”. Hmmm.
I have nothing nice to share with you about Zack Snyder’s embarrassing and onanistic “Sucker Punch.” It is arguably the nastiest and most vile PG-13 film ever released and exists simply to give 16-year old boys something to occupy their “dreams.” Clad in bustiers, short skirts, whorehouse gear, and stilettos, the young girls women of “Sucker Punch” are flying World War II bombers, slaying gigantic fire-breathing dragons, waging war against Nazi zombies, and taking part in countless other ridiculous duels and challenges.
But why? Isn’t that the ultimate? Hot underage-looking girls in next to nothing laying waste to everything in their paths? Can all the 12-20 year old boys put your hands up!!?!?!
Let’s talk about that why, shall we? And I will not try and spoil things, but part of me wants to. In my heart of hearts, I really find “Sucker Punch” deplorable and contemptible.
The premise of “Sucker Punch” focuses on a teenage girl, identified only as Babydoll (Emily Browning), who survives a horrific attack by her stepfather. On this fateful night, Babydoll loses her mother and sister and while she retains her life, she is framed for the murders by her stepfather and sold to a mental health facility known as the Lennox House. The Lennox House is home to the most dangerous female criminals, and all of the girls are thin and pretty size zeros, with flawless hair and make up. But you see there are actually there for another purpose. The Lennox House is, truth be told, a luxurious brothel with high-end clientele. So enter Madame Gorski (Carla Gugino), the woman tasked with making sure the girls are ready to dance, seduce, and entertain those clients. Babydoll’s arrival excites the john running the whorehouse the head of Lennox House, a peculiar figure named Blue (Oscar Isaac). He loves his girls but sees Babydoll as perhaps his hottest acquisition and instructs Madame Gorski to get her “ready” as soon as possible.
At this point, let me remind you that this film is PG-13!?!? The Ratings Board, in all of their infinite wisdom, have deemed this film appropriate for middle school aged children. For comparison purposes, the Academy Award winner for Best Picture of 2010, “The King’s Speech” - the beloved story of a King overcoming a lifelong stammering and stuttering problem to rule his country in a time of war, was rated R and not suitable for children under 17 without a parent or guardian.
But I digress.
Babydoll’s dancing abilities are apparently mind-blowing and to get through the performance, she is told to allow her mind to take her to another place and time in these encounters. When she starts to dance, she awakens in an alternate series of universes where her fellow strippers/dancers/co-workers prisoners join her in fantastical battle sequences, all designed to forge a plan in escaping the Lennox House. Meeting up with the comically named Wise Man (Scott Glenn), the girls are given instructions prior to each battle and nonsensical advice such as, “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.” Gee, thanks.
With those words of encouragement fresh in their minds, the ladies push on to the next round – laying waste to bad guys, bosses, creatures, and whatever else Babydoll can conjure up in her mind. Each fantasy sequence has the look and feel of a really expensive video game. So while initially the visual style feels impressive, this all wears out its welcome so fast that the film devolves into literally one of the most exhausting experiences I can ever recall sitting through.
To escape the Lennox House, Babydoll is told that she will need 5 things to escape the Lennox House/fantasy worlds. The Wise Man instructs her to steal a map, a knife, a key, fire, and naturally, the fifth item will be known to Babydoll when the time is right. Sure. Fine. Whatever.
Babydoll convinces her fellow hookers / her fellow dancers/ her fellow mental health patients to band together and so Babydoll and… (get ready for these empowering character names…) Rocket (Jena Malone), Amber (Jamie Chung), Blondie (Vanessa Hudgens), and Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish) work together to escape Lennox House…or the fantasy world…or both…or does it honestly even matter?
“Sucker Punch” serves no purpose other than to objectify women and titillate young male viewers. It’s as empowering a statement on feminism as the 2 Live Crew’s “As Nasty As They Wanna Be” was back in the day. No rational argument can be made for why these characters wear what they wear, do what they do, and behave in the way they do. This movie has a very driven focus and one that is frankly disturbing and rather dangerous.
Zack Snyder has freefallen off of a cliff here. “Sucker Punch” is the by-product of an ego unchecked, a hack filmmaker who has finally crossed a nasty and troubling line. Whatever novel and unique approach he thought he had come up with here is misguided, misogynistic, offensive, and insulting. Save one dark and twisted and extremely well-made opening montage set to a creepy and disturbing remake of the Eurythmics classic, “Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)”, “Sucker Punch” is a disaster, worthy of any and all consideration for the worst film of 2011. |
|
YES
You think the “chicks” are hot and find the way they are utilized in the film no big deal. You also find people’s concerns about how women are depicted in the media to be pointless and laughable.
Zack Snyder is a visionary in your mind. The visual impressiveness he has exhibited in “300″ and “Watchmen” are more important to you than a story or anything meaningful.
You have money to burn and could not care one bit about what critics and writers think of a film. You are someone who thinks that “critics are always wrong…”
Scripts and their meaning serve of no importance to you. |
NO
If this was positioned as a Tarantino-style “Grindhouse” film, my view would be different. However, the marketing and selling of this movie presents this as something suitable for teenagers and its rating, along with how Warner Bros. marketed the picture, is horribly misleading.
If you have children who attend PG-13 films on their own, ask yourself if you want themes of prostitution, molestation, institutional abuse, images of young girls (adult in age, but made to look like teenagers) wearing skimpy and scantily clad clothing being trained to be exotic dancers and working in a brothel to serve as their latest trip to the multiplex.
The film is offensive and shocking in its recklessness and having these women/girls “do things guys do in movies all the time” does not mute the troubling and overarching misogyny of the film.
|
2 comments
RWR
April 4, 2011 at 11:26 AM (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Wow.
Once again we get to see why people who can’t make films do critiques.
Here’s what I don’t understand . . . you clearly dozed off in the euphoric transcendental idea of watching girls in skimpy outfits.
You missed several key points.
1.) The “brothel” aspect is a fantasy world that the girls put themselves in to cope with the realities of the asylum. Right wrong or otherwise they feel they are being “screwed” by society.
That seemed pretty obvious to those with an educated eye.
2.) The sub fantasies is how they further trip down the rabbit hole to cope with the idea of escaping not only the fantasy world brothel, but also the real world asylum.
3.) Everything foreshadowed is tied up at the end of the film. There is no unanswered questions for those who paid attention without their hands in their pants . . .
Now to really throw you off kilter.
Snyder launched an ad campaign that set everyone up, not only that but he TELLS you he’s setting you up. The trailers give the idea that the story is a typical heroine needs to fend off the bad guys with the aid of her crew and the guidance of the wise man to escape tyranny and win the day. Then he says “You will be Unprepared.” (Which is his way of saying, I’ve given you what you expect, enjoy the rabbit hole.)
Just as your review is your opinion, this is mine.
Mike Ward
April 4, 2011 at 4:22 PM (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Take it easy my friend. Agree to disagree, right? I appreciate your thoughts on “Sucker Punch” and while I am not at all alone in my utter dislike or guttural rejection of the film, you are absolutely welcome and encouraged to share with me your apparent love of the film. A few thoughts…
1) Let me take a look at some of the film work you’ve done, I’d love to see it.
2) I was wide-awake and took in every painful moment of the film…I did like the dark beginning of the film (i.e. the “Sweet Dreams” segment. I thought the sequence was well shot and carried an unsettling creepiness that stops the moment we cut to the car ride to the facility).
3) Share with me your education and I’ll share with you mine!
4) My hands were not in my pants. Zack Snyder’s may have been, but mine certainly were not…
5) Ultimately, your final paragraph indicates that the trailers for “Sucker Punch” indicate a typical story. You say, “…a typical heroine needs to fend off the bad guys with the aid of her crew and the guidance of the wise man to escape tyranny and win the day.” Where is this typical?
Thanks for reading and let’s kick the tires on movies anytime you want to…